This is an archived version of the Beall's list - a list of potential predatory publishers created by a librarian Jeffrey Beall.We will only update links and add notes to this list.
The Beall's web site scholarly-oa.com does not host the Beall's list of predatory journals and ... Jeffrey Beall coined the expression 'predatory open access publishing' in 2010 (Butler, 2013 ...
Beall's List of Predatory Publishers 2013 By Jeffrey Beall Released December 4, 2012 The gold open-access model has given rise to a great many new online publishers. Many of these publishers are corrupt and exist only to make money off the author processing charges that are billed to authors upon acceptance of their scientific ...
Beall's List of Predatory Publishers 2013 By Jeffrey Beall Released December 4, 2012 The gold open-access model has given rise to a great many new online publishers. Many of these publishers are corrupt and exist only to make money off the author
Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.
This presentation looks at the problem of predatory publishers who exploit changes to the publishing landscape in the 21st century. Covering what a predatory publisher is, why they are a problem and including a handy checklist to help assess publishers this presentation is recommended for library staff working in research support roles.
Dec 06, 2012· Having read all that, you can draw your own conclusions on who Jeffrey Beall is and what his real motives behind his publishing house and scientific organization black listing blog are. Houses and Organizations that Jeffrey Beall calls "Predatory Publishers". Maybe it's time to talk about Predatory Librarians, Mr. Jeffrey Beall.
The letter cites "Beall's List of Predatory Publishers 2013," as "actionable libel," particularly its recommendation that "researchers, scientists and academics avoid doing business with these publishers and journals. Scholars should avoid sending article submissions to them, serving on their editorial boards or reviewing papers from them, or ...
Beall's list. Beall's list of potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open-access publishers attempted to identify scholarly open access publishers with questionable practices. In 2013, Nature reported that Beall's list and web site were "widely read by librarians, researchers, and open-access advocates, many of whom applaud his efforts to reveal shady publishing practices."
Jeffrey Beall, who coined the term "predatory open access publishing," is a Scholarly Communications Librarian at the University of Colorado-Denver. Beall studies scholarly open-access publishing, and until January of 2017 he maintained a list of individual journals and publishers he viewed as "potentially predatory."
How reliable is the Beall's List of predatory journals? I have seen many journals which are indexed in DOAJ, Scopus, EconLit, etc but listed under predatory journals by Beall's list.
These days, the impacts of Beall's effort on predatory journals and publishers should not be questioned. Rather the disappointing matter for me and colleagues was the disappearance of Beall's List of potential predatory publishers and journal. Beall, Keep it up
Jul 16, 2019· Below is an example of an email received from a journal listed on Beall's list of predatory publishers (specific details regarding the publication have been anonymised). The journal claims to have a Journal Impact factor of 1.315 but is not actually listed in the Journal Citation Reports database of …
Dec 15, 2014· When considering author-pay online publishing and conference invitations from unknown organizations, potential authors may want to assure that the publisher or journal is not on Beall's list, and if it is, read Beall's comments and any responses from the publisher or editor.
Beall's List was a prominent list of predatory open-access publishers that was maintained by University of Colorado librarian Jeffrey Beall on his blog Scholarly Open Access.The list aimed to document open-access publishers who did not perform real peer review, effectively publishing any article as long as the authors pay the open access fee. Originally started as a personal endeavor in …
Beall's List: Potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open-access publishers This is a list of questionable, scholarly open-access publishers.
This website is a copy of Beall's list of predatory publishers & journals. It was retrieved from cached copy on 15th January 2017. The list itself will not be changed, I may however add notes to the list.
Jan 15, 2019· This is an archived version of the Beall's list - a list of potential predatory publishers created by a librarian Jeffrey Beall. We will only update links and add notes to this list. A list of new predatory publishers is available below the original one.
Jan 24, 2017· Beall's list of 'predatory' open access journals has disappeared but the information isn't lost: It still exists across many resources - including on Publons. Note: It is worth clarifying here that Publons is not an indexing service. That means that any journal in the world can have some kind of presence on Publons.
Jan 15, 2016· Beall's List of Predatory Publishers 2015 by Jeffrey Beall, January 2, 2015 Each year at this time I formally release my updated list of predatory publishers. Because the list is now very large, and because I now publish four, continuously-updated lists, this year's release does not include the actual lists but instead includes statistical…
Jan 30, 2017· Jeffrey Beall's list of these publishers and journals was controversial (that adjective seemed to be required by law to appear in the same sentence every time the site was first mentioned). There is a margin at which people argue about whether a given title is "predatory" or not.
Jul 09, 2019· Threats of legal cases by some of the publishers he had labelled as 'predatory' resulted in Beall taking the list down. Inside academia, Beall had received a lot of recognition for his list and for systematically analysing and identifying predatory journal practices, which many scholars were using to avoid falling into these journals' traps.
Dec 13, 2012· Jeffrey Beall's list is not accurate to believe. There are a lot of personal biases of Jeffrey Beall. Hindawi still uses heavy spam emailing. Versita Open still uses heavy spam emailing. But these two publishers have been removed in Jeffrey Beall's list recently. There is no reason given by Jeffrey Beall why they were removed.
Jeffrey Beall, a librarian at the University of Colorado-Denver, who curates a blacklist of "potential, possible, or probable" predatory OA publishers and journals. Beall's list has become a go-to tool and has even been featured in New York Times but it is not the final word on predatory publishing, partially because Beall himself has a ...
A 2015 study by researchers at the Hanken School of Economics in Finland found that "predatory" publishing skyrocketed between 2010 and 2014, during which the number of scholarly articles published in journals on Beall's list increased nearly tenfold. Many academics also rely on the lists to determine if a journal or a publisher is ...
Jul 18, 2019· Beall's List: Criteria for Predatory Open-Access Publishers Based on an analysis of publisher content, practices, and websites according to established ethical standards. BioMed Central
University of Colorado Denver librarian and researcher Jeffrey Beall, who coined the term "predatory publishing", first published his list of predatory publishers in 2010. Beall's list of potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open-access publishers attempted to identify scholarly open access publishers with questionable practices.
Beall's List of Predatory Publishers Posted on January 23, 2017 by Catherine Voutier | This is an archive copy of the latest edition of Beall's list before it went dark. As scholarly publishing moves quickly, this static list will lose relevancy over time. Check out this check-
"Predatory publishers are also becoming more aggressive," said Dr. Holland, "sending emails with subject lines like, 'Your submission is overdue.'" Growing. From 2011 to 2017, Jeffrey Beall, a librarian at the University of Colorado in Denver, kept a list of "potential, possible, or probable" predatory journals and publishers.
The recent letter published in The American Journal of Medicine by Mimouni et al entitled "Beall's list removed: what stands between us and the open access predators?"1 raises an important question: are there any alternatives to Beall's List of predatory journals and publishers?